|
Melbourne Transport |
Common Urban Myths About TransportMyth:
Cars are more efficient than public transport because they never run empty
Fact:
Not every person-trip in a car is valuable. When one person drops off
another and returns home, the car is equivalent to a public transport
vehicle with no-one but a driver on board.
This argument occurs to many people who are disillusioned by observing some of the useless bus services that run around Melbourne's suburbs. The thought is that with a timetabled public transport service, there's always some chance that the vehicle will run empty and the trip will be wasted. But cars always have someone in them, so they have a head start in efficiency. If one thinks a little more carefully, this isn't really true. Even an 'empty' public transport vehicle has a driver on board; however, the driver quite properly isn't counted when tallying up the 'valuable' journeys. But what happens when a parent drives a child from home to a friend's place and returns straight home again? There is only one 'valuable' journey: the child going to the friend's place. Effectively the car is empty on the trip home, and three person-trips have been generated for the equivalent of one valuable journey! If the child had access to effective and safe public transport, those extra two trips could in principle be avoided. In transport surveys, the fastest-growing trip purpose is the one charmingly designated 'Serve passenger'. In 1964, about 9 per cent of trips in Melbourne were of this type; by 1994, this had doubled to 18 per cent. Moreover, latest figures from the Victorian Activity and Travel Survey indicate that 40 per cent of all school travel involves a parent travelling from home to school and returning directly home again. So this isn't just an academic point: it has important consequences for the way we assess transport policy. © 2007 Public Transport Users Association Inc. (PTUA), Victoria, Australia. ABN 83 801 487 611. Last Modified: 26 December 2004 |